That “left evolutionist scientists confused and unable to provide a suitable account” for its formation. “The find was a big surprise”… They “never imagined” finding that!! If their models continue to confuse and surprise them, then maybe there are better models!! (No Evolution and A Global Flood) Read more about it here: https://creation.com/ammonite-in-amber Picture from:...
Read More
Caves – Fast or Slow? Cave Formations – Fast or Slow? Also, how did caves form soooo deep underground?? “Caves and their decorations, speleothems, are commonly thought to have formed slowly over millions of years. However, secular scientists struggle to explain how caves could have been excavated by the weak carbonic acid formed in surface soil. Moreover, speleothems are dated too young to fit within their paradigm, and drip locations cannot remain in one place long enough...
Read MoreModern diamictites (or mixed debris flows) are seen with glaciers that have left rock piles tens of feet thick. In places around the world (even near the equator), there is evidence of huge boulders (as much as one mile in diameter) that are dropped and in some cases exploded (you can actually see the puzzle pieces as to how to put it back together). These huge boulders are so big they have layers – geology within them. To explain such enormous boulders being...
Read More
187 Parrot-beaked Dinosaurs buried together in Mongolia!! What’s the most reasonable explanation? See: https://creation.com/massive-graveyard-of-parrot-beaked-dinosaurs-in-mongolia Picture from: https://pixabay.com/photos/dinosaur-psittacosaurus-644622/ accessed 1/6/23.
Read More
There are numerous major problems that secular scientists have in explaining the ice age including: “that glacial rock debris contains very few trees or vegetation. If a uniformitarian ice age occurred, it would have begun in the far north and slowly moved south at a (literal) glacial pace. The ice should have picked up innumerable trees and vast amounts of other vegetation on its way, if these were present. Charlesworth states: “The rarity of vegetation in the drift...
Read More
Uniformitarian scientists believe in Ice Ages, but they cannot explain them! “They realize that an ice age requires much cooler summers, much more snow, and a climate change that persists for hundreds of years.4 What would cause these factors to come together? It has been repeatedly shown that the disruption caused by the global Flood would lead naturally to this confluence.4 However, those who reject the Flood continue to extrapolate present processes millions of...
Read More
Can I get your perspective on the 7th and 8th chapters of The Global Flood by John Morris, which gets into some of the more specific scientific evidences for a global flood. Also, I was quite impressed in the depth of the geologic scientific evidence from this conference. I would love to hear your thoughts on these: “90 Minutes of Geological Evidence for Noah’s Flood – Dr. Kurt Wise” -This has a great overview of the lithostratigraphic column. AND… “What was the...
Read More
“What would a billion years of erosion do to the top of this basement rock?4 Erosion carves valleys between mountains and gullies or canyons between hills. But the top of the basement rock just beneath the Jurassic Entrada Sandstone is perfectly flat!5 It looks like not even one year elapsed between these features. Similarly, what would a billion years of earthquakes and tectonic motions do to basement rock? They would leave numerous fissures, tilts, and cracks. But...
Read More
Charles Lyell – one of the most influential geologists never accepted the idea of Ice Ages! He considered Ice Ages as too “catastrophic” and his bias towards slow change over long periods of time influenced his conclusions. Read more about that here as well as other problems that secular scientists have regarding the Ice Age: https://creation.com/ice-age-problems Picture from: https://pixabay.com/illustrations/sloth-frozen-ice-age-ice-sunset-5849090/ accessed...
Read More
Here is a great example of real scientific investigations where the scientists’ assumptions changed the date numerous times. Note: This could be an example of how scientists can refine and get better results over time, but it is nonetheless definitely a great example showing some reasons to doubt the accuracy of radiometric dating or reasons to hold more lightly to quoted radiometric results. Read the details here: https://creation.com/how-dating-methods-work...
Read More“The existence of salt lakes and inland seas provides strong evidence that there has been a global Flood. The huge salty Caspian Sea is completely landlocked and during the past several centuries has been shrinking in size. How did seawater get so far inland? Why did it not dry up millions of years ago? A gigantic flood within the last 5,000 years would seem to be a very good answer. Lake Van (5,900 feet in elevation) to the southwest of Ararat and Lake Urmia...
Read More
And this quote comes from National Geographic – do we really have enough evidence of human evolution?? Check this out! “The fossil record is frustratingly ambiguous. Slightly older than H. erectus is a species called Homo habilis, or “handy man” – so named by Louis Leakey and his colleagues in 1964 because they believed it responsible for the stone tools they were finding at Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania. In the 1970s teams led by Louis’s son Richard found more H....
Read More
Friends - Richard's Life was Changed!! - And this is why he is leading AOI's Colorado Family Camp! Join us July 30 - Aug 4 - conta.cc/3X4JroB pic.twitter.com/u8j1AP1Pmu
Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team.
Would you like to subscribe to our mailing list? Join our mailing list to receive the latest news and updates from our team, and be the first to know about new products and special offers in our store!
