“They noted that if humans have actually been around for several hundred thousand years or more, according to RAO they should have accumulated 8 to 59 times the amount of mutations that we currently observe in Y chromosomes worldwide. Quite notably, they empirically proved that we can only observe about 4,500 years of mutation accumulation in all of human paternal ancestry, as documented in the record of the human Y chromosome.” Read more here:...
Read MoreGenetic Evidence for the three daughter-in-laws of Noah!!
“Jeanson showed how major mitochondrial DNA lineages followed a maternal ancestry back to the three wives of Noah’s sons (figure 2).22” “Figure 2. An unrooted mitochondrial DNA tree representing 369 individuals of different ethnicities. The large block arrows point to the three major branch nodes believed to correspond to the wives of Noah’s three sons (from Jeanson22)” Read more here:...
Read MoreGenetic Studies BETTER Match Young Earth Creation Predictions!!
Who said Creationists can’t make predictions?? “Figure 1. Predictions of mitochondrial DNA diversity for the evolutionary model and the young-earth creation model compared with the actual diversity observed. As can be seen, the actual empirical data matches the creation model (from Jeanson22).” Read more here:...
Read More5-10 Thousand Not Hundreds of Thousands!!
Here is great Genetic Evidence that the human race all traced back only several thousand years not hundreds of thousands as assumed by evolutionary models!! “Research by both secular and creation scientists indicates a date of modern human origins of not more than 5,000 to 10,000 years (reviewed by Tomkins in 2015).12 For the purposes of this current review, I will briefly summarize these earlier findings before describing more recent efforts that confirm and...
Read MoreMathematics – Evidence of God and His character!
“Unbelievers can use the mechanics of mathematics without being able to explain what counting is or provide a logically consistent reason for why mathematics works, particularly when applied to natural systems. The problem is that their worldview claims that the universe came into existence by chance and has no non-material dimension (e.g., everlasting human souls). The fact that materialistic naturalists count and use complex mathematics to accomplish amazing...
Read MoreJesus really lived!!
“Among scholars of the New Testament of the Christian Bible, though, there is little disagreement that he actually lived. Lawrence Mykytiuk, an associate professor of library science at Purdue University and author of a 2015 Biblical Archaeology Review article on the extra-biblical evidence of Jesus, notes that there was no debate about the issue in ancient times either. “Jewish rabbis who did not like Jesus or his followers accused him of being a magician and...
Read MoreEvidence of a Biblical Earthquake
Evidence of biblical earthquake from days of King Uzziah found in Jerusalem! Confirmation yet again that the Bible is True! Take note of Mary Jo’s personal experience seeing some of this evidence: “We visited another site in Israel where you could clearly see evidence of the earthquake predicted by Amos in the days of King Uzziah. It was one of the most memorable sites in Israel for me. Now they have found evidence in Jerusalem that seems like it was from this earthquake...
Read MoreIf you are an evolutionist, consider these:
“All three disciplines [Biology, Geology/Paleontology, and Cosmology] are replete with evidence that is inconsistent with the [Naturalistic Evolutionary] paradigm. For example, evidence from genetics clearly shows that mutations, rather than creating new and ever-more complex DNA as required by evolution, cause continuous degradation of DNA. Geneticist, Dr John Sanford, calls this genetic entropy and it eventually causes extinction. This happens so fast that humans...
Read MoreThe Good and the Bad of Peer Review:
“Peer review, while advertised as ensuring the veracity of published material, does not actually do this. Numerous frauds have been documented. Rather, it serves to enforce the orthodoxy of the ruling paradigm. This is well illustrated by the experience of Dr Mary Schweitzer, who first discovered soft tissue in dinosaur bones: ”I had one reviewer tell me that he didn’t care what the data said, he knew that what I was finding wasn’t possible,” says Schweitzer. ”I...
Read MoreLIMITS OF SCIENCE
“Science does not prove hypotheses/theories to be true, only that they are false. The best it can do is provide evidence that is consistent with a theory but this does not prove the theory to be true. The same evidence could be consistent with some other theory. Evidence that is consistent with two (or more) theories does not provide a basis for choosing between these theories. However, evidence that is inconsistent with a theory demonstrates that it is wrong....
Read More80 Fossil Whales – 1 Big Catastrophe??
Wow!! 80 fossil whales smashed up together in one area in the Chilean desert!! Scientists have to admit that some big catastrophe happened there to bury so many whales! … The question now is, how big of a catastrophe? Could this and many other evidences make a global Flood a reasonable explanation? Read more details here: https://creation.com/chile-desert-whale-fossils Picture from: https://pixabay.com/photos/museum-bone-skull-texel-ecomare-966624/ accessed...
Read MoreAn Ammonite in Amber!!
That “left evolutionist scientists confused and unable to provide a suitable account” for its formation. “The find was a big surprise”… They “never imagined” finding that!! If their models continue to confuse and surprise them, then maybe there are better models!! (No Evolution and A Global Flood) Read more about it here: https://creation.com/ammonite-in-amber Picture from:...
Read More