A Starburst in the Middle East rather than the Out-of-Africa idea of the Origin of Human Cultures! Is there any historical account that would describe a dispersion of people groups from the Middle East??? “Quite notably, they discovered that both the maternal and paternal unrooted phylogenetic analyses gave very similar results. The first key similarity observed was that the branching pattern displayed in both DNA datasets indicated a large expansion of human...
Read MoreGenetic Evidence for the three daughter-in-laws of Noah!!
“Jeanson showed how major mitochondrial DNA lineages followed a maternal ancestry back to the three wives of Noah’s sons (figure 2).22” “Figure 2. An unrooted mitochondrial DNA tree representing 369 individuals of different ethnicities. The large block arrows point to the three major branch nodes believed to correspond to the wives of Noah’s three sons (from Jeanson22)” Read more here:...
Read MoreGenetic Studies BETTER Match Young Earth Creation Predictions!!
Who said Creationists can’t make predictions?? “Figure 1. Predictions of mitochondrial DNA diversity for the evolutionary model and the young-earth creation model compared with the actual diversity observed. As can be seen, the actual empirical data matches the creation model (from Jeanson22).” Read more here:...
Read More5-10 Thousand Not Hundreds of Thousands!!
Here is great Genetic Evidence that the human race all traced back only several thousand years not hundreds of thousands as assumed by evolutionary models!! “Research by both secular and creation scientists indicates a date of modern human origins of not more than 5,000 to 10,000 years (reviewed by Tomkins in 2015).12 For the purposes of this current review, I will briefly summarize these earlier findings before describing more recent efforts that confirm and...
Read MoreIf you are an evolutionist, consider these:
“All three disciplines [Biology, Geology/Paleontology, and Cosmology] are replete with evidence that is inconsistent with the [Naturalistic Evolutionary] paradigm. For example, evidence from genetics clearly shows that mutations, rather than creating new and ever-more complex DNA as required by evolution, cause continuous degradation of DNA. Geneticist, Dr John Sanford, calls this genetic entropy and it eventually causes extinction. This happens so fast that humans...
Read MoreAbsolute Rejection…Apart from the Evidence!
“We should reject, as a matter of principle, the substitution of intelligent design for the dialogue of chance and necessity (Behe 1996); but we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical system, only a variety of wishful speculations.” Franklin Harold, The Way of the Cell, p. 205, 2001. Picture from: https://pixabay.com/photos/magnifying-glass-detective-looking-4340698/ accessed...
Read MoreSimilarity Maybe, But Big Differences!
“If human similarity to apes is evidence that an apelike creature evolved into man, why aren’t the vast differences between man and ape accepted as evidence that man did not descend from apes?” In other words: Humans are similar to apes = Evidence of Evolution Humans and apes are very different = Evidence of Different Creations I think the second evidence may be stronger! Check out these shocking differences! “…The human nose is totally different from that of...
Read More“If ENCODE is right, evolution is wrong.”
If Evolution has occurred due to mutations occurring randomly over long periods of time, then the human genome would just be filled with extra stuff – “Junk DNA”. The Encode Project “undermined the “junk DNA” myth and simultaneously fulfilled an ID prediction: that non-coding parts of the genome would prove functional. Junk-DNA proponents like Dan Graur were upset at the time, admitting as Jonathan Wells reported, “If ENCODE is right, evolution is wrong.”...
Read More“Striking” – Complexity and the Incredible Functional Nature of DNA
“Striking” – Complexity and the Incredible Functional Nature of DNA is Evidence of an Intelligent Designer!! “Skipper says it was “striking” to find that they were able to assign a “biochemical function” to 80 percent of the genome: striking, because “not such a long time ago, we still considered that a vast proportion of the human genome was simply junk.” Birney comments, “It’s very hard to get over the density of information” in the genome. They found places that...
Read MoreComplex and specified information, computer-like systems, and incredible machines!!
“The past fifty years of biological research have found that life is fundamentally based upon: A vast amount of complex and specified information encoded in a biochemical language. A computer-like system of commands and codes that processes the information. Irreducibly complex molecular machines and multi-machine systems. Where, in our experience, do language, complex and specified information, programming code, and machines come from? They have only one known...
Read MoreUh-oh! Fishing may be changing the genetics!
Uh-oh! Typical fishing practices may be reducing the genetic abilities for large and fertile fish. This is change due to selection – but still not an example of upward evolution (which is what the theory of evolution requires). “And this next statement from the researchers is particularly telling: “The loss of these genetic ‘types’ may mean that populations may not be able to recover completely or at all.” Now what a curious thing, that these evolution-believing...
Read MoreThe Wombat – a Backwards Creature!!…But Evidence of a Designer!!
“The wombat is one of Australia’s many unique creatures that is found nowhere else on earth. This animal is a marsupial – meaning it has a pouch in which prematurely born young finish their development. Having a pouch is great if you are a kangaroo – but a wombat is a burrowing animal. If the pouch opened toward the mom’s head, the pouch would quickly fill with dirt. So the wombat’s pouch faces backward; it opens towards the mother’s hind legs. Now,...
Read More