There are numerous major problems that secular scientists have in explaining the ice age including: “that glacial rock debris contains very few trees or vegetation. If a uniformitarian ice age occurred, it would have begun in the far north and slowly moved south at a (literal) glacial pace. The ice should have picked up innumerable trees and vast amounts of other vegetation on its way, if these were present. Charlesworth states: “The rarity of vegetation in the drift...
Read MoreIce Ages – but how…and why?
Uniformitarian scientists believe in Ice Ages, but they cannot explain them! “They realize that an ice age requires much cooler summers, much more snow, and a climate change that persists for hundreds of years.4 What would cause these factors to come together? It has been repeatedly shown that the disruption caused by the global Flood would lead naturally to this confluence.4 However, those who reject the Flood continue to extrapolate present processes millions of...
Read MoreFor any GEOLOGY enthusiasts and experts:
Can I get your perspective on the 7th and 8th chapters of The Global Flood by John Morris, which gets into some of the more specific scientific evidences for a global flood. Also, I was quite impressed in the depth of the geologic scientific evidence from this conference. I would love to hear your thoughts on these: “90 Minutes of Geological Evidence for Noah’s Flood – Dr. Kurt Wise” -This has a great overview of the lithostratigraphic column. AND… “What was the...
Read MoreWhat would a BILLION years do???
“What would a billion years of erosion do to the top of this basement rock?4 Erosion carves valleys between mountains and gullies or canyons between hills. But the top of the basement rock just beneath the Jurassic Entrada Sandstone is perfectly flat!5 It looks like not even one year elapsed between these features. Similarly, what would a billion years of earthquakes and tectonic motions do to basement rock? They would leave numerous fissures, tilts, and cracks. But...
Read MoreDating Changes!
Here is a great example of real scientific investigations where the scientists’ assumptions changed the date numerous times. Note: This could be an example of how scientists can refine and get better results over time, but it is nonetheless definitely a great example showing some reasons to doubt the accuracy of radiometric dating or reasons to hold more lightly to quoted radiometric results. Read the details here: https://creation.com/how-dating-methods-work...
Read MorePlanetary Rings – Problematic for the Billions-of-Years Models!
I tried to limit the size of this post (HA!) – but there were some great excerpts from the following article. Enjoy! “The theory that explained how Saturn’s rings could persist through 4.6 billion years of solar system evolution also explained why Saturn was the only planet that could have a ring. Then those theories had to be revised to account for the rings of Uranus. The revisions implied that Jupiter would not have a ring. Now Jupiter has been found to have a...
Read MoreHow and When Does Magma Cool?
Evidence to make you question the reliability of radiometric dating: “The following is a quote from The Earth: An Introduction to Physical Geology by Tarbuck & Lutgens, pp. 55-57, (1987). “For example, at the stage when about 50 percent of the magma has solidified, the melt will be greatly depleted in iron, magnesium, and calcium, because these elements are found in the earliest formed minerals. But at the same time, it will be enriched in the elements...
Read MoreFollowing Dino Tracks Lead Us To Conclude That There Was A Flood!
“All the footprints are indeed going in the same direction, as if all the dinosaurs are fleeing, but what were they fleeing from? We suggest it was not from predators, but from a flood of water. What flood? Noah’s Flood, described in the Bible in Genesis Chapters 6–9. Another reason is that footprints normally don’t last long. Try this yourself: leave footprints outside anywhere you like, and see how long they last. Noah’s worldwide flood provided the sediment...
Read MoreComets – still a problem for billions of years!
Here is more evidence showing a lack of evidence for the Kuiper Belt. This means that there is still not enough evidence for the natural origins of short-period comets and this points to a recent Creation and Creator!! Read more here: https://creation.com/charon-crater-comet-conundrum
Read MoreA New Discovery near Stonehenge!!
– That again shows the intelligence of ancient man!! And I love how they try to date it using radiometric dating, but come up with dates that are “not reliable.” Radiometric dating requires some big assumptions…and there are big differences from the evolutionary assumptions to the Biblical Creationist’s assumptions! Check out these quotes: “as far as archaeologists peer back into history, humans have always been humans, displaying their God-given abilities of...
Read MoreYou should see our CAVE!!
On Tuesday, we showed some examples of how cave formations can and have formed quickly! In this picture, you can see our stalactites in our “cave” storage area underneath the concrete entranceway. If one inch forms every 100 years, our 40 year old office building is more than 300 years old!!! (But actually most of that larger soda straw has formed in less than 3 years!!)
Read MoreHow Old Is That??
Visitors on cave tours are almost always told that the large stalactites and stalagmites have taken tens of thousands or even millions of years to form. Recent discoveries have shown this is not necessarily so. Consider the following: A bat (not yet decomposed) was found cemented inside a stalagmite in Carlsbad Caverns, New Mexico. This had to have formed recently and VERY rapidly. In a cave in the Tehuacan Valley of Mexico, there is a vast chamber called Hall of the...
Read More