“…Although the JW’s discoveries are radically inconsistent with secular predictions about galaxy formation, these predictions will just be changed soon to accommodate them. Compared to all the other fatal problems that the Big Bang model has—and all the contortions that the secular community has gone through to protect it—creating new predictions for accelerated galaxy formation will be child’s play. The continued survival of the Big Bang model—despite a long list of...
Read MoreHuge Problems! – Shouldn’t they panic?
The James Webb Telescope Discovers Huge Problems for secular models, but most still aren’t panicking!! “It might seem strange that secular astronomers aren’t reacting more strongly than this. The JW observations are so inconsistent with secular expectations that it seems logical to question the broader model that produced those expectations. But this would be to ignore the bigger context. With very few exceptions, the secular astronomical community accepts the Big Bang...
Read MoreWhy a Young Earth is So Important!
Great article on why believing in a Young Earth as a Christian is so important! See the authors conclusion here: “In closing, it is my strongest conviction as a Christian that 6-day creation is the only long term viable option for Christian theology. As D. Martin Lloyd-Jones said, “I have no gospel unless Genesis is history.”” Read more detail here: https://isgenesishistory.com/6-reasons-christians-embrace-6-day-creation/ Picture from:...
Read MoreGenetics Points to a Young Earth!
Great Summary: “The new Y-chromosome genetic data brings a huge challenge to the secular science community. While discussing the ramifications of this, Jeanson recently stated: “I’m anxious to see how the evolutionists try to dismiss this second, independent line of genetic evidence for the young-earth timescale. Not only do they have to explain why the data contradict evolution, they have to also explain why the data are such a tight match with the predictions...
Read MoreNot Enough Mutations for Evolutionary Time!!
“They noted that if humans have actually been around for several hundred thousand years or more, according to RAO they should have accumulated 8 to 59 times the amount of mutations that we currently observe in Y chromosomes worldwide. Quite notably, they empirically proved that we can only observe about 4,500 years of mutation accumulation in all of human paternal ancestry, as documented in the record of the human Y chromosome.” Read more here:...
Read More5-10 Thousand Not Hundreds of Thousands!!
Here is great Genetic Evidence that the human race all traced back only several thousand years not hundreds of thousands as assumed by evolutionary models!! “Research by both secular and creation scientists indicates a date of modern human origins of not more than 5,000 to 10,000 years (reviewed by Tomkins in 2015).12 For the purposes of this current review, I will briefly summarize these earlier findings before describing more recent efforts that confirm and...
Read MoreDeath Valley – a Large Ice Age Lake!!
Death Valley was a large lake during the ice age!! This is a Huge Challenge for Secular Ice Age Models! “These ‘once-wet’ deserts are extremely difficult for a uniformitarian earth scientist to explain, because their Ice Age models require a very cold and thus much drier climate than we have today… …An Ice Age requires abundant precipitation (moisture condensing out of the air) to make the ice sheets, and to fill the ancient Ice Age lakes. The problem the...
Read MoreFascinating Dating Argument:
“Radiometric dating is not objective science. It is not like measuring the length of something, or its weight. Scientists don’t argue about the chemical composition of a rock, because measurements like that are objective, experimental science. However, they do argue over calculated dates because every calculation is based on assumptions about the past, assumptions that cannot be checked because we do not have a time machine. And if the dates are unappealing...
Read MoreBent Rock Layers – Evidence of the Flood!
“Normally, solid rock cannot bend without breaking, so this leaves only two options for bending: either the rock layer was bent while still soft, shortly after being deposited by water, or after the layer had fully hardened, it was bent by pressures which made the rock plastic, like playdough. Geologists who believe the layers were laid down over millions of years accept the latter option.” One geologist’s in-depth, four year study concludes: “By comparing the...
Read MoreCaves – Fast or Slow?
Caves – Fast or Slow? Cave Formations – Fast or Slow? Also, how did caves form soooo deep underground?? “Caves and their decorations, speleothems, are commonly thought to have formed slowly over millions of years. However, secular scientists struggle to explain how caves could have been excavated by the weak carbonic acid formed in surface soil. Moreover, speleothems are dated too young to fit within their paradigm, and drip locations cannot remain in one place long enough...
Read MoreLead is too Mobile – Evidence to make you question the reliability of radiometric dating:
“Another possibility to keep in mind is that lead becomes gaseous at low temperatures, and would be gaseous in magma if it were not for the extreme pressures deep in the earth. It also becomes very mobile when hot. These processes could influence the distribution of lead in magma chambers…” “…Here is yet another mechanism that can cause trouble for radiometric dating: As lava rises through the crust, it will heat up surrounding rock. Lead has a low melting point, so...
Read MoreToo Much Radium – Evidence that make it Reasonable to Question the Reliability of Radiometric Dating:
“Some information from the book Uranium Geochemistry, Mineralogy, Geology provided by Jon Covey gives us evidence that fractionation processes are making radiometric dates much, much too old. Geology contributing author Massimo Cortini cites a very interesting anomaly regarding the U 238 decay chain, which is U-238, U-234, Th-230, Ra-226, Rn-222, Po-218 Po-214, Po-210, Pb-210, Bi-210, Pb-206. The half life of U-238 is 4.47 x 10^9 years and that of Ra-226 is 1.6 x...
Read More