“All three disciplines [Biology, Geology/Paleontology, and Cosmology] are replete with evidence that is inconsistent with the [Naturalistic Evolutionary] paradigm. For example, evidence from genetics clearly shows that mutations, rather than creating new and ever-more complex DNA as required by evolution, cause continuous degradation of DNA. Geneticist, Dr John Sanford, calls this genetic entropy and it eventually causes extinction. This happens so fast that humans...
Read MoreThe Good and the Bad of Peer Review:
“Peer review, while advertised as ensuring the veracity of published material, does not actually do this. Numerous frauds have been documented. Rather, it serves to enforce the orthodoxy of the ruling paradigm. This is well illustrated by the experience of Dr Mary Schweitzer, who first discovered soft tissue in dinosaur bones: ”I had one reviewer tell me that he didn’t care what the data said, he knew that what I was finding wasn’t possible,” says Schweitzer. ”I...
Read MoreAlternatives in science are often squelched!
But alternative ideas and views should be encouraged and developed – as they often drive innovation and the progress of science! “Data do not speak for themselves but need to be interpreted within a framework or paradigm – a set of assumptions about the nature of reality. Disciplines tend to get captured by a ‘ruling’ paradigm that forms the unquestioned framework for interpreting data. Inconsistent data are typically disregarded using various...
Read MoreLIMITS OF SCIENCE
“Science does not prove hypotheses/theories to be true, only that they are false. The best it can do is provide evidence that is consistent with a theory but this does not prove the theory to be true. The same evidence could be consistent with some other theory. Evidence that is consistent with two (or more) theories does not provide a basis for choosing between these theories. However, evidence that is inconsistent with a theory demonstrates that it is wrong....
Read More80 Fossil Whales – 1 Big Catastrophe??
Wow!! 80 fossil whales smashed up together in one area in the Chilean desert!! Scientists have to admit that some big catastrophe happened there to bury so many whales! … The question now is, how big of a catastrophe? Could this and many other evidences make a global Flood a reasonable explanation? Read more details here: https://creation.com/chile-desert-whale-fossils Picture from: https://pixabay.com/photos/museum-bone-skull-texel-ecomare-966624/ accessed...
Read MoreAn Ammonite in Amber!!
That “left evolutionist scientists confused and unable to provide a suitable account” for its formation. “The find was a big surprise”… They “never imagined” finding that!! If their models continue to confuse and surprise them, then maybe there are better models!! (No Evolution and A Global Flood) Read more about it here: https://creation.com/ammonite-in-amber Picture from:...
Read More2 Types of Willful Ignorance
Many people don’t want the Bible to be True. There are 2 types of willful ignorance: “Both varieties of wilful ignorance flow from not wanting there to be a Creator to whom we are accountable. Some people know where the light-switch is, but won’t flick it, remaining in the dark. Others have turned the light on, and quickly turned it off, not liking what they saw and not wanting others to see it either… …Some of the wilfully ignorant flatly reject the information...
Read MoreNot Enough Evidence for Evolution!
4-legged Fossil Footprints now demote one of the evolutionist’s favorite transitional creatures – Tiktaalik! The tracks were found supposedly 9 million years older than tiktaalik – so Tiktaalik is not the link between fish and 4-footed land animals. Listen to their words now: “Paleontologists are taken aback by the discovery of the tracks. “We thought we’d pinned down the origin of limbed tetrapods,” says Jennifer Clack of the University of...
Read MoreAbsolute Rejection…Apart from the Evidence!
“We should reject, as a matter of principle, the substitution of intelligent design for the dialogue of chance and necessity (Behe 1996); but we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical system, only a variety of wishful speculations.” Franklin Harold, The Way of the Cell, p. 205, 2001. Picture from: https://pixabay.com/photos/magnifying-glass-detective-looking-4340698/ accessed...
Read MoreI Love This! – They have the same problem!
This is a great explanation showing how Big Bang scientists have the same problem that’s one of the biggest problems charged against Young Earth Creationists!! See this secular video showing their problem: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axrbSOFIdnk The question goes: If the Earth and Universe are young, how did the light from extremely distant stars reach Earth in only thousands of years? I have a two-part response to that: Big Bang Scientists have the same problem...
Read MoreSimilarity Maybe, But Big Differences!
“If human similarity to apes is evidence that an apelike creature evolved into man, why aren’t the vast differences between man and ape accepted as evidence that man did not descend from apes?” In other words: Humans are similar to apes = Evidence of Evolution Humans and apes are very different = Evidence of Different Creations I think the second evidence may be stronger! Check out these shocking differences! “…The human nose is totally different from that of...
Read MoreCaves – Fast or Slow?
Caves – Fast or Slow? Cave Formations – Fast or Slow? Also, how did caves form soooo deep underground?? “Caves and their decorations, speleothems, are commonly thought to have formed slowly over millions of years. However, secular scientists struggle to explain how caves could have been excavated by the weak carbonic acid formed in surface soil. Moreover, speleothems are dated too young to fit within their paradigm, and drip locations cannot remain in one place long enough...
Read More