“It is all based on the assumption of evolution and the alleged age-date of the fossils, and so gets back to the fact that a person’s worldview determines how these fossils are interpreted.”
“Ancient cranium discovered in Ethiopia suggests early hominin evolutionary tree is messier than we thought.”19 In Science, Michael Price’s article had the headline “Stunning skull shakes human family tree”.20
“Writing for the BBC, Pallab Ghosh mentions the irritation of anthropologists, including a senior editor at Nature, when the term “missing link” is used to describe a fossil they believe to be “part-ape and part-human.”23 One of the chief reasons for the editor’s irritation is said to be “the recognition that there are many links in the chain of human evolution and most if not nearly all of them are still missing.”23”
Read more here: https://creation.com/anamensis