– That again shows the intelligence of ancient man!!
And I love how they try to date it using radiometric dating, but come up with dates that are “not reliable.”
Radiometric dating requires some big assumptions…and there are big differences from the evolutionary assumptions to the Biblical Creationist’s assumptions! Check out these quotes:
“as far as archaeologists peer back into history, humans have always been humans, displaying their God-given abilities of great intelligence and ingenuity.”
How old is the Durrington circle?
Silts (fine mud) extracted from core samples and the circle’s pits, contained bones and shells, which were sent for carbon-14 dating. A wide range of dates were calculated, some as old as 7,179 ± 28 years BC for shell, and 1130 BC for bone (calibrated), but all from the same deposits. The archaeological report admits: “There is a wide range of time represented in the radiocarbon dates… early dates are on shells and suggest that the determinations from these samples are not reliable…”2
Read more here: https://creation.com/stonehenge-durrington-circle
